Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a44c8e119bba9de8

Jump to content

Talk:Radiata

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Lollipop in topic Nematostella vectensis as bilateral animal?

Proposed merger

[edit]

Please see discussion at Talk:Eumetazoa

Metazoa to Eumetazoa

[edit]

Metazoa can be ambiguous, being either a synonym for Animalia, or a daughter taxon to Animalia, sister to Parazoa (the sponges). Eumetazoa is an unambigous term for the animals other than the sponges (and a few obscure oddities). Eumetazoa is conventionally divided into Radiata and Bilateria. -- Dalbury(Talk) 19:34, 8 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Nematostella vectensis as bilateral animal?

[edit]

I know the sources cited state N. vectensis exhibits bilateral symmetry, but you sure can't tell that from the article at Starlet sea anemone. I think this is confusing for the reader. Does anyone know of a source that explains how this species exhibits bilateral symmetry? -- Donald Albury 18:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Niel Shubin explains it on page 113 of Your Inner Fish. It's called "directive symmetry." Zyxwv99 (talk) 22:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
coming here almost 20 years later to ask the same thing. I'll look into this because I don't think its bilateral. thanks Lollipop (talk) 05:32, 19 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Is there any reason to use 'homoplasy' rather than 'convergent evolution'? Homoplasy seems like a specialist term, certainly not a word that would be known to a member of the general public. DlronW (talk) 01:35, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply