Talk:Radiant Nuclear

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Beta Beta Beta (talk) 19:04, 19 September 2026 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that a factory making portable nuclear reactors is being built on an old Manhattan Project site in Tennessee?

• Source: "...an approach it is backing with two facilities in El Segundo and a new “R‑50” microreactor factory now under development at a former Manhattan Project site in Tennessee, which it ultimately intends to scale to about 50 Kaleidos units per year." link

• • ALT1: ... that the Wyoming Freedom Caucus campaigned against a proposed factory manufacturing portable nuclear reactors? Source: "Rachel Rodriguez-Williams, chairman of the Freedom Caucus ... said the group is standing up to California billionaires who 'insist on saddling our landscapes with their windmills, their solar panels and now their radioactive waste.' At several public meetings, members of the Freedom Caucus made it clear they do not have 'Fear Of Missing Out (FOMO)' when it comes to companies like Radiant. " link
  • ALT2: ... that the Wyoming Freedom Caucus campaigned against California-based Radiant Nuclear's proposed factory making portable nuclear reactors? Source: Same as ALT1
  • Reviewed:

Created by H2so4aq (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

H2so4aq (talk) 20:09, 28 August 2026 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Easy pass, no image is used, article is meets copyvio, length, and neutrality requirements. Hook is interesting and cited. ALT hooks are also good to go if the editor moving this to prep area decides they are more suitable for display on the main page. ❯❯❯ Mccunicano☕️ 13:26, 6 September 2026 (UTC)