Talk:R v Saibene
Add topicLatest comment: 12 years ago by NSH001 in topic NPOV
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name of article
[edit]As this is a criminal and not a civil case, I believe the name of this article should probably be of the form "R v (list of defendants)". However, as I am not a lawyer, I have posted a request for help and advice at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law.
--NSH001 (talk) 16:01, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- above comment is correct. EDO MBM Technology v. Smash EDO campaign was the name of an earlier civil case brought by the company against the smash edo protesters in 05-06. see EDO Injunction Case EDO MBM were not a party in the 2010 criminal case which was titled R v Saibene and others, other wise knbown as the EDO Decommissioners case, so this article should use one of those as a title.
- The EDO Decomissioners case was brought by the Crown Prosecution Service CPS against the defendants.
- The MD of EDO MBM, Paul Hills was a witness for the prosecutions and was cross examined by the defence team about his company's links to Israel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.193.227.236 (talk) 23:43, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you, those comments were very helpful. --NSH001 (talk) 08:05, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
NPOV
[edit]I do not think this article is currently written from NPOV. cagliost (talk) 16:48, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Could you please explain what you think is wrong, and what should be changed? We can't do anything without further detail, otherwise the POV tag should be removed. --NSH001 (talk) 09:15, 3 July 2014 (UTC)