Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a260ac78f8d314c2

Jump to content

Talk:R v Collins

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 16 years ago by JohnC in topic Rename

Rename

[edit]

The name of this article is too close to R. v. Collins, the Supreme Court case. Renaming this article to R. v Collins (appeal) might be the way to go. If the next person who reads this agrees, please move this article to a new name. -- Suntag 14:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, they are both appeals, so that wouldn't help much. Since it is impossible to know in advance what search terms readers will use to get here (or there), and there are only two cases with this name, hatnotes on both cases would probably be the way forward. That would also avoid having to rejig all the incoming links to both cases. --Rodhullandemu 14:55, 1 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
That's my view as well. Collins was at one time a pretty important case in English law and I came here looking for it by searching for R v Collins. 82.68.102.190 (talk) 19:56, 5 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

I don't know that "romantic" is the right word for "an almost naked man with an erect penis" standing outside a woman's window! Lewd might be better.JohnC (talk) 08:19, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply