Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25526bcec6d7fd8

Jump to content

Talk:RTRFM

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 days ago by David Gerard in topic Name origin seems spurious

Requested Move

[edit]

Disagree Whilst I can understand the reasoning behind the request to rename the article (in order to standardise all radio stations to using the official ACMA callsign) however the station identifier (used in the press) is what people are aware of not the ACMA callsign. This identifier is used throughout wikipedia in a varierty of articles - in order to minimise confusion that will no doubtly arise through renaming the article I would suggest that there be a redirect from RTRFM to 6RTR at the very least. Dan arndt (talk) 06:04, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Name origin seems spurious

[edit]

The name RTRFM is a contraction of "aRTy Radio". This appears entirely spurious. I was there at the time and nobody remembered who thought of the name or what it meant! I wrote this in Party Fears at the time, in the interregnum when the station wasn't on air in 1991:

The callsign for the station is 6-RTR-FM (Rocket To Russia? Road To Ruin? It actually doesnt stand for anything — it was picked ‘cos X-Press printed it as being this. True. Where they got it is a mystery.)

I'll let someone else decide the RS-ness of a home-made fanzine, if a prominent one that won an award. Might count as a newsblog by an expert, your call - David Gerard (talk) 11:33, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Added here, 2007-09-27, by someone who hasn't edited in a looong time. I've removed the claim as uncited and spurious. Needs a cite earlier than September 2007, and preferably 1991 - David Gerard (talk) 15:14, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply