Talk:RISE controllers

Comments on the first draft

I have created this page to describe the control development using RISE. I hope this is informative enough to explain the readers how to design a RISE controller for a practical system. However, I would appreciate inputs from other contributors to explain the Lyapunov-based analysis for RISE in details. Additionally, mathematical inputs on the development for higher-order systems, practical examples, and decentralized multi-agent implementations will be highly appreciated. Omkarpatil24 (talk) 20:45, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Requested move 14 June 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Moved to RISE controllers. (closed by non-admin page mover) cyberdog958^Talk 14:24, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

---

Robust Integral of the Sign of the Error (RISE) Control → RISE controllers – Make shorter and remove repetition of name and acronym from title per WP:Name (acronym). I did this move boldly and was reverted without any explanation. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 06:15, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

• Support. In my opinion, RISE controllers is a more concise, shorter and general term, while Robust Integral of the Sign of the Error (RISE) control is a more descriptive formal title in nature. Fade258 (talk) 17:03, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

  I agree with the suggestion Omkarpatil24 (talk) 21:30, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.