Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a290056cc95acf81

Jump to content

Talk:RFA Empire Gull

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Dmgerrard in topic Liberty ship?

Liberty ship?

[edit]

I would like to point out that some "Liberty Ships" were built in Canada. Have any of you pedants even been aboard the "Black Pig"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Medcroft (talkcontribs) 18:18, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

It is my understanding that all 2,751 Liberty ships were of the same standard design, which displaced over 14,000 tons, while this ship is a 5,000 ton LST. If you have a reliable source that says it's a Liberty ship, I'd be interested to see it. Hohum (talk) 19:28, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Agree that the Liberty Ships were a standardised cargo vessel design, so this LST cannot be one. However, maybe Medcroft is thinking of a slightly different ship type or has confused the terms: could Empire Gull be one of the Empire ships?. -- saberwyn 05:23, 11 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
It is an Empire Ship. It's in the wiki category for this already, although it's not specifically mentioned in the article. Hohum (talk) 19:28, 11 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
It might be worth doing so, but I leave it up to the regular editors of the article to decide yes or no. -- saberwyn 20:10, 12 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have been aboard her and can confirm she bore no relation to a Liberty ship. All British ships built by the Government in WW2 (apart from warships) were prefixed Empire, regardless of type. Dmgerrard (talk) 20:58, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply