Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a220a52b6fea5b65

Jump to content

Talk:REPowerEU

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Anonymous Libertarian in topic Should we remove the "History of EU energy demand" section?

Feedback from New Page Review process

[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!.

North8000 (talk) 12:41, 7 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Should we remove the "History of EU energy demand" section?

[edit]

To me, the section seems unnecessary. The first paragraph is too general for the article and reads entirely like a personal essay, while the second paragraph seems to be redundant and provides information that is already stated in other parts of the article.

A similar point could be made for the "Key factor of change", but I don't think it should be deleted entirely. Rather, that section could be renamed and trimmed instead, to remove any unnecessary sections and only keep the parts that are useful. On the other hand, it would probably be better to remove the "History of EU energy demand" entirely instead of editing it. I do want to hear some feedback on the talk page first before deleting a section entirely though. Anonymous Libertarian (talk) 20:35, 30 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

I can see that a lot of the irrelevant information has been removed from the section, so I don't think it needs to be removed at this point. Anonymous Libertarian (talk) 02:52, 12 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Readability

[edit]

This article is hard to read, relevant information is buried, and incomplete. As time passes we should also have more on consequences and goal achievements. I'll do a few quick fixes, but more is needed. jax (talk) 07:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)Reply