Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a28a7663fded0d7f

Jump to content

Talk:Quotaism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Section "Criticism" uses the wrong meaning of the word

[edit]

In wikipedia, a "criticism" section should be a NPOV summary of how a work or concept is received by expert commentators in the field, per definition 2 of the Cambridge dictionary "the act of giving your opinion or judgment about the good or bad qualities of something or someone, especially books, films, etc.".

The "criticism" section of this article is instead definition 1: "the act of saying that something or someone is bad".

This section is biased, under-referenced and reads like an opinion piece rather than an encyclopedic article. This section needs to be rewritten to give cited, attributed opinions as to why "quotaism" is a good thing or a bad thing. With so many examples of quotaism in action given, someone somewhere must have a good word to say about this.

Wikipedia will be better without this section as it currently is, if improvewments to not occur I suggest it is simply removed.

MegaSloth (talk) 09:41, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Reply