Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a257c2195e98b86e

Jump to content

Talk:Qumran

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Klbrain in topic Merge Qumran and Qumran Caves

Merge Qumran and Qumran Caves

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
To not merge as proposed; better segregation of contents has support. Klbrain (talk) 11:46, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

These two articles appear to have the exact same scope. Onceinawhile (talk) 19:45, 18 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

I don't think it is a problem to have two clearly delineated articles here, potentially one on the geography feature itself (the series of caves) and any associated archaeology, and the other one on the national park as an administrative unit (and any contained archaeological features) - but this arrangement would require some slight rescoping and content reshuffling to ensure that the two subject are actually properly delineated: at the present the situation is far more re-duplicative. Also, if one article is about a national park, it should be titled officially, i.e. "Qumran National Park". Iskandar323 (talk) 05:02, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Agreed with all of Iskandar's points. A straight-up merge seems like too much to put on one page, but there could definitely be some better segregation of the contents.00:20, 13 November 2023 (UTC) — Moriwen (talk) 00:20, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.