Talk:Quixey
Add topicLatest comment: 11 years ago by XcentricXplorer in topic (Untitled)
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 31 July 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Quixey article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Quixey be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites. |
(Untitled)
[edit]Reads like propaganda from Quixey PR. Numerous claims -- for instance, that Quixey invented a 'new kind of search' -- are vague and unfalsifiable. Many of the claims made in the article are currently untrue: For instance, Quixey search is now Android-only. Also, much of the information is out-of-date: Quixey currently has significantly more than 50 employees, closed a C round of funding some time ago, etc. Full disclosure: I have a business relationship with Quixey. XcentricXplorer (talk) 16:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
I second XcentricXplorer comments. Sentences like "Quixey is like PageRank..." are untrue and point to PR-ish articles that say the reverse.