Talk:Quetena

Did you know nomination

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that a lava sample from the Quetena volcano in Bolivia chemically resembles rocks from millions of years before its age?

• Source: L 8: rhyodacite, Quetena volcano, 4350 m; 67°23'W, 22°17'S. (p. 95)

High-K calc-alkaline association (Table 2, lavas L 4–L 10). According to the data of Jakeš and White (1972), this group can be attributed to the shoshonite association. (p. 98) In southwestern Bolivia, the Miocene and Early Pleistocene lavas belong to the high-K calc-alkaline association. (p. 99)

• • ALT1: ... that a 1977 survey dated lava flows at the Bolivian volcano Quetena to the Holocene, but a later assessment placed them much earlier? Source: Lava effusions along fissures (Quetena) and a few endogeneous extrusions (Khara Laguna, Escala) occurred in Holocene time. (p. 88) De Silva (2007 pers. comm.) indicated that volcanism in this area is pre-Holocene and may be Pleistocene or older.
  • ALT2: ... that a magnetism survey found a three-dimensional electrical structure in the crust beneath Quetena volcano in Bolivia? Source: Some areas with 3-D effects can be identified (e.g., near Volcan Quetena at distance of 40 km on the Bolivia section, and at isolated stations and at long periods on the Argentina profile). (GSA Data Repository 2015087, p. 2) Skew values are higher in a couple of areas, notably close to Volcan Quetena (west of Volcan Uturuncu) and also in NW Argentina. (GSA Data Repository 2015087, p. 6)
  • ALT3: ... that scientists considered the region around the Quetena volcano as a potential area for a geothermal power plant in Bolivia? Source: There are no geothermal power plants in Bolivia, but seven areas bordering on Chile are considered prospects. They are: Sajama...Quetena. No deep wells have been drilled yet.
  • ALT4: ... that the Quetena volcano shares names with a Triassic rock sequence in Chile? Source: Triassic volcanic and sedimentary units include the Quetena, Observatorio and Cerros de Chuquicamata Sequences [in Chile] (Tomlinson and Blanco, 2008). (p. 209) ...in the sectors of Cerro Quetena and Pampa Limón Verde, they are composed of clasts of muscovite schist, metamorphic quartz, and detrital muscovite and rutile derived from erosion of the LVMC. (p. 210)
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/History of Llanthony Priory

Created by RabidTuberculosis (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 14 past nominations.

RabidTuberculosis (talk) 23:46, 10 July 2026 (UTC).

• @RabidTuberculosis I really want to approve this, it looks interesting. There are two unsourced statements in the article, which should be removed or else cited to a source. The first states "The Quetena River rises near the volcano and flows north, eventually joining the Río Grande de Lípez and draining into the Salar de Uyuni." The second unsourced statement says "The surrounding area, part of the Eduardo Avaroa Andean Fauna National Reserve, is visited by tourists travelling through the Sur Lípez region, and Quetena Chico and Quetena Grande serve as waypoints for guided climbs of the higher, more frequently visited Uturuncu." Also, the source does not state "Quetena is the tallest fissure-vent volcano in the world." NewAccount7295 (talk) 03:59, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
  • @NewAccount7295: Thanks for your thorough review! Added references to both statements, and modified the wording to more closely match the sources. The Quetena River line now cites an open-source science journal and I split the tourism line into two sentences after trimming content a bit. To the last point, the Smithsonian's GVP survey lists every documented volcano (Holocene or Pleistocene epoch) on the planet by type, and lists Quetena as the tallest fissure-vent. The database does not make statements but the data is otherwise unambiguous, so I've left it in the article with a link to the complete database. Please let me know if you have other comments! RabidTuberculosis (talk) 22:38, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
    • @RabidTuberculosis: Those sound like good additions, but for some reason it doesn't look like the edits went through? NewAccount7295 (talk) 23:56, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
      • @NewAccount7295: Ah that's weird, should be good now! RabidTuberculosis (talk) 01:35, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
        • Good to see them sourced now! I'm going to see what another reviewer thinks and ask for ALT3 to be chosen when that happens, although I think "potential area" should be changed to "viable area". The article has pretty good DYK potential. NewAccount7295 (talk) 02:22, 26 July 2026 (UTC)