Talk:Quentin L. Cook
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Quentin L. Cook article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Quentin L. Cook appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 October 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
Hospital Info Recommendation
[edit]Hi all,
Justing flagging the last paragraph in the Bio background section about Cook’s role in hospital privatization. Right now it occupies about 25% of that bio section. For a BLP, I think this might be giving the topic more weight than needed for a BLP.
Per WP:BLP and WP:UNDUE, negative material should be carefully balanced and included if it’s clearly a significant part of the subject’s public profile. Most coverage by media organizations of Cook seems to focus on his legal and executive career in general, rather than on this specific controversy.
I’d suggest we either trim it back to a sentence or two that acknowledges the issue or consider removing it if consensus is that it’s not central to his notability.
Here’s one possible trimmed version to consider:
During his legal and executive career in California’s healthcare sector, Cook was involved in hospital privatization efforts that drew some public criticism at the time.
This way, the article still notes that there was some controversy, but it doesn’t go into excessive detail. Thoughts?Dakotacoda (talk) 21:21, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- Start-Class Latter Day Saint movement articles
- Mid-importance Latter Day Saint movement articles
- Wikipedia requested images of Latter Day Saint people (Public Domain)
- WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject United States articles

