Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25566de3b5eada9

Jump to content

Talk:Quebec Route 389

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 20 years ago by Violetriga in topic WP:RM

WP:RM

[edit]

It was suggested that this article should be renamed Quebec route 389. The vote is shown below:

  • Can't find the talk page for this move - there are no clear links.
I say NAY on the move - the title convention for articles on Canadian highways is
(Province name) provincial highway (highway number). The page List of Quebec provincial highways is a long list of names following this convention.
Let's leave this article for 389 where it is and stick to the convention.

-GBC 22:32, 24 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

  • "Route" is a common American identification. It probably is used somewhat in Canada, however, in most provinces, it is far more common to use "Highway".
What do English-speaking Quebeckers use? What do French-speaking Quebeckers used? Perhaps it would be good to get a handle on this, then, before the articles on Quebec highways proliferate, adopt that standard for the province.
"Autoroute" is the unquestioned standard for the four-lane divided highways that are known as freeways outside the province.
    • The above unsigned by 03:33, 25 July 2005 Gcapp1959

From what I can tell, the MTQ uses "Route 389" online. I suggest Route 389 (Quebec) for ease of use with the pipe trick. --SPUI (talk) 00:24, 3 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

This article has been renamed after the result of a move request. violet/riga (t) 18:22, 4 August 2005 (UTC)Reply