Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25534deffcf5b65

Jump to content

Talk:Quds Day

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Qods day / joursalim day

[edit]

Qods day can not be chosen to appose joursalim day as it has been set in 1979 and J day is 1998 ! the whole wording is similarly misleading --Qakhoo (talk) 19:46, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Jerusalem Day (Yom Yerushalayim) was declared a new holiday by the Israeli government on May 12, 196 ~2026-15121-39 (talk) 00:32, 11 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
[edit]

the first External link doesn't work. HaShumai (talk) 17:32, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Edit request 28 May 2025

[edit]

Description of suggested change: Change a parameter name to fix one use of the {{cite book}} template.

Diff:

{{Cite book |last=Küntzel |first=Matthias |title=Tehran's Efforts to Mobilize Antisemitism: The Global Impact |chapter=Tehran's Efforts to Mobilize Antisemitism |date=2015 |work=Deciphering the New Antisemitism |publisher=Indiana University Press |isbn=9780253018656 |pages=508–532 |jstor=j.ctt18crxz7.22}}
+
{{Cite book |last=Küntzel |first=Matthias |title=Tehran's Efforts to Mobilize Antisemitism: The Global Impact |chapter=Tehran's Efforts to Mobilize Antisemitism |date=2015 |title=Deciphering the New Antisemitism |publisher=Indiana University Press |isbn=9780253018656 |pages=508–532 |jstor=j.ctt18crxz7.22}}

Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 19:32, 28 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Oh, sorry, I forgot: the "title=" in the current version should be a "chapter=". Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 04:18, 29 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Donemacaddct1984 (talk | contribs) 14:24, 4 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! That clears all the Q entries from Category:CS1 errors: periodical ignored. Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 16:30, 4 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Islamic holy month

[edit]

The text, Islamic holy month of Ramadan should be changed to Islamic month of Ramadan. This is because Ramadan is not holy to everyone..and therefore the article should be changed so it does not look like the article is imposing Islam on everyone. ~2026-15121-39 (talk) 23:54, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Edit request 13 March 2026 "Participation" Section

[edit]

Description of suggested change:

The "Participation" section for this page is limited to three sentences. One source is cited for the information included. However, the claims being made are attributed to someone named Roger Howard, who is not quoted in the article or credited as the author of the piece. The claim that Iranians under 30 are less interested in Quds Day seems to be absent from the article as well. Beyond these issues, the source cited, Iranian International, is funded by the Saudi government. Its editorial independence has been questioned. This may not be a reason to edit or remove this section, but the section does misrepresent the article and credits someone (Roger Howard) who doesn't appear to be associated with the article in any way. Thank you.


Diff: Warning Unnamed parameter |2= set to default value. Please change it. Failure to use {{Text diff}} to specify your requested text changes, if not adequately described above, may lead to your request being denied.
Dsa605 (talk) 20:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

  •  Not done: You missed a citation midway through the section, right after "has nothing to do with us". Easy mistake to make, don't worry about it. The citation goes to a book written by Roger Howard. That is the source is for the claim about Iranians under 30 being less interested in it as well. The only part being sourced to Iranian International is the part specifically attributed to it, so it should be alright. ―Maltazarian (talkinvestigate) 23:37, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply