Talk:QualNet
Add topic | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Written like a commercial
[edit]A was asked for a short review of this article. I.m.h.o. it fulfills the notability criteria since Qualnet is mentioned in 2310 academic articles according to scholar.google.com. Since the difference from GloMoSim now is clarified, it is not necessary to merge the articles. However, the article lead is written like a commercial. Can it be given a more neutral style? Mange01 (talk) 22:54, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- I added more content. Of note, I was a QualNet user in the 2000s, but I have no COI. I tried to beef up the facts so people understand why there are so many research papers about QualNet. As I am still relatively new, the sources are still not great, so it still needs work. Jennifer at Integral Thread (talk) 20:20, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
Object to deletion on Grounds listed
[edit]I, personally, oppose the contested deletion based on the reasons listed ("Product does not exist anymore"). From the Model T to the Mac II, it appears that there is a large consensus in favor of keeping product pages after that product has ceased to be produced. -Achowat (talk) 13:38, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Citations added
[edit]I added citations to satisfy the banner request.Fergyman (talk) 19:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)