Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a227c6c62d2adbb4

Jump to content

Talk:QuakeFinder

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WP:SPA and WP:PROMOTION issues

[edit]

The article has asserted as fact what might actually be WP:FRINGE violations. And as for the primary author, Scottsandler (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Yakushima (talk) 11:36, 28 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Largely resolved, I think. I'm taking the tags down. Yakushima (talk) 08:32, 30 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Help with citation

[edit]

Please help me figure out how to add a citation to a NASA grant: Cooperative Agreement (NASA Grant Number NNX08AF11G -Effective Date: 12/20/07 to 12/20/10.) POC Dr. John LaBrecque NASA Earth Surface and Interior Focus Area — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottsandler (talkcontribs) 17:58, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

LaBrecque might help with that. He can be reached at john.labrecque@nasa.gov. BTW, four tildes ("~") signs your posts. Yakushima (talk) 09:22, 30 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Searching here with grant number NNX08AF11G turned up substantiation. Yakushima (talk) 07:37, 30 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Moving toward WP:NPOV compliance

[edit]

I'd like to be able to take down the tagging on the Quakefinder article before the week is out. Scott, with your recent contribution here surely you have a better handle on potentially balancing sources than I do. It looks like a quote from Johnston would go a long way toward bringing the article into compliance with WP:NPOV Yakushima (talk) 06:17, 5 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Benefit from Update: Company Closed, Research Reported

[edit]

This article would benefit from an update with sources correcting the company's status (closed) and final field test reports. The article would also benefit from corrected and updated information reporting it's legal status (for-profit), as the hyperlink to the company's mission statement is dead (rotted) and the archived (Wayback Machine) mission statement represents the company as having filed a for-profit charter. The Footnote #2 does not make sense for a for-profit company. SciTechWrite (talk) 01:08, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply