Talk:Qdot
Add topicLatest comment: 1 month ago by Oyinbabyo in topic False Positive: AI-Generated Content Flag
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
False Positive: AI-Generated Content Flag
[edit]I noticed that my recent edits to Qdot were flagged or reverted under suspicion of being AI-generated content. I want to assure the community that this text was entirely self-written, and I do not use LLMs to generate article text ever.
I understand that my writing style may appear formal or highly structured, which might mimic AI patterns, but the text is 100% human-authored.
To demonstrate compliance with Wikipedia's verifiability guidelines:
- I manually pulled every fact from the two articles cited on the respective paragraph.
- I can provide the exact text snippets from my sources to prove that the information was summarized by hand.
I welcome feedback on how to adjust the tone or phrasing to better fit the Wikipedia Manual of Style if the current wording looks unnatural. I request that the flag be removed. Thanks in advance! Oyinbabyo (talk) 08:51, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
- Apologies for the accusation, will remove that tag. ᴸᵃᶠᶠʸTaffer💬(they/she) In solidarity 13:08, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
- No problem. Thanks a lot! Oyinbabyo (talk) 13:13, 18 June 2026 (UTC)