Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a229cccc9f42f4e0

Jump to content

Talk:Pyreneanism/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Chiswick Chap in topic GA review

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Bobby Cohn (talk · contribs) 21:22, 30 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 18:42, 12 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Comments

[edit]

What an extraordinary and fascinating subject, well presented.

  • I've fixed a few minor errors of typography and formatting.
    • Merci.
  • The language is in places somewhat Gallic in style, i.e. perhaps bordering on the flowery rather than the encyclopedic, but not unreasonably so. A little copy-editing would not go amiss.
  • I'd drop the "Notable" from the list of 'Pyreneist and Pyrenean mountaineers'; we never list non-notables (and it chimes oddly with the mass of redlinks).
    • I agree, thoughts on the use of "Select"?
      • Could be ok, if you need to use any word there: or just do without.
  • Please avoid the use of the word "today" as it's a moveable feast. E.g. in 'Contemporary perception'.
    • Revised, reworded one, dropped one.
  • "defines Pyreneism by positioning it in opposition to" -> "defines it in opposition to"
  • "intense and original publishing activity" -> "publishing activity"
    • Done, above link.
  • "an unquestionable prerequisite" -> "a prerequisite"
    • Done, above link.
  • "Himalayanism and Andinism" - one a redlink, the other a redirect to Mountaineering which however does not even mention the term. Suggest we remove both links; ideally get the redirect deleted as well (ex GAN).
    • Removed as links, italicized as MOS:WAW but let me know if this is incorrect.
  • "the chain has constituted 'a major space of transport and mobility'" - well, that's the passes, not the chain of summits (as the first sentence of 'History' makes clear); and the quote's wording is excessively Gallic for Wikipedia, suggest we just say "the range's passes have been important for transport" which is all that is meant here.
  • Please gloss Carbonnières, de Chausenque, and Russell at first mentions in main text.
    • I'll be honest, I didn't 100% know what you mean by gloss, I assumed you meant "give context" (glossary?), so I added what made them notable based on their respective Wiki leads, or biographies if it was solely about the Pyrenees. Please let me know if I missed the mark here.
      • Yes, a gloss is just a few words introducing someone or something for those who don't know.
  • Replace redlink "Pique Longue" with Pic Long. Obsolete spelling.

Images

[edit]
  • All images are on Commons, either PD or plausibly CC-by-SA. They are all suitable for the article.

Sources

[edit]

Sources are all suitable for Wikipedia.

  • [24] date should be 1898 in ref
  • [52..56] date (2024) is missing in refs
    • Done, in above edit.
  • Some French titles are missing translations, e.g. [6], [11].
  • I don't have Bordes to hand so AGF there.

Spot-checks:

  • [2] ok
  • [6] ok
  • [14] ok
  • [57] ok
  • [68] ok

Summary

[edit]

The article is in an excellent state, and I've made no more than the most minor of comments, so I expect to see this at GA very shortly.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.