Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria
This article is within the scope of WikiProject North Macedonia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North Macedonia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North MacedoniaWikipedia:WikiProject North MacedoniaTemplate:WikiProject North MacedoniaNorth Macedonia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
In this edit you cited Heraclides' and Grigorov's books as source in this article.
Heraclides' book claims that "St. Petersburg was trying to sustain a balance between Bulgarian and Serbian influence in Macedonia, and the idea that the local Slavs were neither Serbs nor Bulgarians was welcome" and Grigorov's book claims that "his claims were not accepted unanimously either in St. Petersburg or in Bulgaria. Draganov's articles ignited controversy in Russian academic circles themselves. Draganov was sharply criticized and accused of real ignorance of the Macedonian dialect.".
However, you cited Grigorov's claim, adding "His theses were not unanimously accepted in Saint Petersburg and Bulgaria. His articles on the Macedonian issue sparked polemics in Russian academic circles, with Draganov being accused of having inadequate knowledge of the Macedonian vernacular", which, as I can see, has no original or any other sources cited in his book for that claim.
Sure. What do you have in mind? The claim by Heraclides is originally from Tchavdar Marinov in the Entangled Histories of the Balkans - Volume One: National Ideologies and Language Policies, p. 430. StephenMacky1 (talk) 09:18, 18 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
My opinion is that Marinov's and Heraclides' books are more reputable than the journal "Ştiinţă, educaţie, cultură" and they should be taken into consideration. Or, if you agree, the claims should be divided as "per X historian…". Kkapidan (talk) 13:54, 18 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
I have no problem with including both claims and attributing them. Their books are good, but they do not have much information about Draganov and I had to work with something. StephenMacky1 (talk) 13:59, 18 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=icon}
.svg){kind=icon}
