Talk:Puneett Chouksey

Contested deletion

• Keep – This page should not be speedily deleted because it is obvious that WP:BLP of the same subject will obviously have the same date of birth, place of birth, the same family members, of having attained the same degree and having done the same works,

But that cannot essentially categorize the present ARTICLE to be a repost of the PREVIOUSLY DELETED VERSION.

Plus, as per the previous discussion. The result to delete the previously created article on the SAME SUBJECT was made at 08:15, 28 April 2018 (UTC) However, it is to be noted that majority (infact all except for one) of the reliable sources quoted in the present article are dated after the result of the previous discussion.

Therefore, CSD G4 becomes INVALID to delete this article I would like to add on that the article previously made on the subject was deleted as the subject had not attained WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR!

However, at present the subject has fulfilled the criteria of WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR, So why is there even a need to delete this article?--Aleyamma38 (talk) 04:59, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

I declined the speedy for the reason you stated, but the sourcing might not pass another AfD. Times of India interviews and profiles are often disregarded for notability, because "The Times of India is considered to have a reliability between no consensus and generally unreliable" (WP:RSP). Fences&Windows 23:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

@Fences and windows: Thanks a lot Sir/Ma'am, I did not know that The Times of India is considered to have a reliability between no consensus and generally unreliable(WP:RSP). I will try my best to add as many other resources to pass the other AFD. However thanks a million again for this support--Aleyamma38 (talk) 09:58, 11 March 2021 (UTC)