Talk:Public Transport Victoria

Multiple issues

The template should be fairly self-explanatory. POV relates to language used and the inclusion of sections like the PSO sub-heading, which to me is largely irrelevant to this article. Could be shrunk down to a simple reference in another section. Takerlamar (talk) 03:48, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Public Transport Victoria

PTV and Vicroads still operate separate websites despite being merged into DoT. TheTrainNoch (talk) 02:19, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

PTV has moved to 'Transport Victoria'

PTV website is now part of transport victoria the article must be adjusted accordingly. MrPloh (talk) 02:27, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

If you are talking about article content, then yes it might need extra info and/or rewording. If you're talking about the article name though, Wikipedia prefers using commonly used names in secondary sources rather than official names. If you wish to change the article title/name, you should follow the guidelines at WP:RM as it may be controversial and to gain WP:CONSENSUS for the change. Fork99 (talk) 10:31, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

I'd also note that there is some coverage of "Transport Victoria" at Department of Transport and Planning, where I think it mostly belongs. Triptothecottage (talk) 03:03, 10 September 2025 (UTC)