Talk:PsiQuantum
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Cirosantilli2 in topic Secondary sources
 | This article was nominated for deletion on July 23, 2022. The result of the discussion was delete. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secondary sources
[edit]Hi all,
I am the creator of this article in its second incarnation. I have tried to address the comments about the previous lack of secondary sources and have added quite a few. I am not sure what more is required and why what is already there is not sufficient. Happy to discuss. Ctjk (talk) 14:28, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- To clarify, I am not connected to the first version which was ultimately deleted. I can see that the earlier version did not cite as many secondary sources and have tried to address that point in my version. Ctjk (talk) 14:29, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Ctjk. Could you please confirm if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, because if so you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Thanks. Cabrils (talk) 01:56, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- No, I don't have any connection with the company. I am a legal official at a major government antitrust agency. The only plausible connection is we regulate tech firms Ctjk (talk) 13:45, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Ctjk: I have reviewed the article and it seems to me that the company has, as of now, received sufficient coverage (WP:CORPDEPTH) to merit inclusion within en-wiki, especially in light of the new funding it received from governments in 2024 (I have slightly expanded the Australian funding section based on the sources and analysis I found, some of which are critical of some of the company's statements - which is a good indicator of independence). It seems to me that this article would likely survive at AfD now given the continued in-depth coverage in independent sources. Pilaz (talk) 09:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- No, I don't have any connection with the company. I am a legal official at a major government antitrust agency. The only plausible connection is we regulate tech firms Ctjk (talk) 13:45, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Ctjk. Could you please confirm if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, because if so you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Thanks. Cabrils (talk) 01:56, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Let's see if it sticks for now, thanks for trying User:Ctjk. Deletionism in Wikipedia is excessive these days, and could open space for other projects to come along. For the benefit of others, I was the previous creator, and this is the discussion page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/PsiQuantum Cirosantilli2 (talk) 20:20, 15 November 2024 (UTC)