Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25dae8668ce231f

Jump to content

Talk:Psammite

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Mikenorton in topic Sedimentary v metamorphic

Sedimentary v metamorphic

[edit]

To what extent is the term used for sedimentary rocks rather than metamorphic rocks? I'm unfamiliar with the former but familiar with the latter. cheers Geopersona (talk) 06:07, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

It seems to be mostly Russian and Eastern European sources that use psammite and pelite for sedimentary rocks. A quick look at the first 100 results on Google Scholar (after 2015) for "psammite" suggests that this usage represents approximately 10% of published papers. It's clearly not the dominant usage, but it needs to be mentioned in the article. Mikenorton (talk) 13:55, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
In the "Metamorphic Rocks: A Classification and Glossary of Terms" (a result of IUGS Subcommission on the Systematics of Metamorphic Rocks (SCMR)) "psammite" is one of those terms that its says should have only "restricted use" - that is "are those that are only used locally or rarely and require further definition if used". This flies in the face of what I would call "normal usage", which doesn't look like it's going to change any time soon. That leaves us in a bit of a quandary, as we generally try to stick to IUGS recommended nomenclature. Mikenorton (talk) 14:15, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply