Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24ca28dbbea962d

Jump to content

Talk:Psalm 151

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Svartalf in topic canonicity and liturgical usage in the west

untitled

[edit]

most of this page is plagiarized from the footnotes of the NET Bible (or vice versa?) http://bible.org/netbible/index.htm?adp1.htm 24.141.12.194 (talk) 05:12, 11 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Liturgy

[edit]

A discussion of Psalm 151's use in the liturgy would be an improvement for this article. Rwflammang (talk) 22:22, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Cultural influence

[edit]

Psalm 151 is a Song by Boris Grebenshikov — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.200.224.67 (talk) 16:20, 5 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Part of the "psalter"?

[edit]

The article section "Dead Sea scrolls discovery" claims Psalm 151 was "part of the psalter used by the Qumran community". Psalter is a term used with fairly specific meaning in Christianity, especially in Eastern Orthodox tradition. Was that term also used by ancient Hebrews, and do the Dead Sea scrolls in fact identify it so specifically? Or do we just have a mistaken case of an editing summary using a familiar term? I've applied a citation needed. Evensteven (talk) 08:51, 23 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

canonicity and liturgical usage in the west

[edit]

I find the part of the page about liturgical usage of that psalm in the Catholic rite either outright false, or terminally outdated... that psalm doesn't even figure in most Catholic bibles... the jerusalem bible, for instance, omits it altogether and calls psalm 150 the "final doxology" of Psalms, obviously treating it as a kind of ending formula, which makes sense as 150 is just a call to worship without any other real meaning to it. Svartalf (talk) 15:19, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply