Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
Latest comment: 20 days ago3 comments2 people in discussion
This section reads like a brochure from a naturopath's office rather than a simple summary of the nutritional aspects of edible prunus species. I'd like to remove the whole section & replace it with a single paragraph titled "nutritional and culinary uses" or somesuch, highlighting the main nutritional aspects & human foodways. "Other uses" might include the manufacture of cyanide compounds, the use of fruit wood in woodworking and flavoring, etc. But before I commit to tracking down citations, I would like to hear what others think? Lucy Kemnitzer (talk) 17:48, 7 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Agree entirely, so have deleted the section as you suggest. Unfortunately, that misinformation has existed for years. I will review the nutritional information for the individual Prunus fruit articles mentioned.
As this article is about the genus, specifics for each fruit should be linked to the respective fruit article, and a summary of general uses for the genus would be appropriate, as you propose. Zefr (talk) 18:19, 7 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
The nutritional and phytochemical information for the articles on cherry, almond, plum, apricot, and peach (including nectarine) are accurate, up-to-date, sourced appropriately, and neutrally discussed.
By definition, phytochemicals in these Prunus fruits are specific botanical characteristics, and are not nutrients, as they have no recommended dietary intake levels, and no WP:MEDRS-established effects on human health. Zefr (talk) 19:11, 7 July 2026 (UTC)Reply