Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21f5d4e5c67eee6

Jump to content

Talk:Propeller

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Dolphin51 in topic Remove coverage of aircraft props?

Prior Use of Marine Propellers

[edit]

I believe this article ignores prior uses of propellers (propelling screws) for marine propulsion. In particular, Bushnell's Turtle, from the US Revolutionary War, utilized a screw propeller. Fulton adopted it for his Nautilus at the start of the 19th century. John Stevens used propelling screws on his early steamboats, predating Fulton's North River Steamboat. Stevens even had a feature for adjusting prop pitch. Tomligon (talk) 22:10, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Cycloid Propeller

[edit]

Currently the Cycloid Propeller is mentioned in the header section - and claims of a higher efficiency with NO reference, and never mentioned later in the article. Perhaps should be removed. Whole article is lacking in references Wfoj3 (talk) 14:21, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposal to hive off part of this page

[edit]

I feel that the mathematical detail in the Propeller theory paragraph lies unhappily with the remainder of the page. I suggest that a simpler summary be retained, while the bulk of the maths is shifted to a separate page named "Propeller theory" '. As it is, one may read through all the figures and still have no idea about the approximate real-world values for slip on, say, a small fast-spinning outboard-motor propeller, or a large slow-turning oil tanker prop. Arrivisto (talk) 08:36, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

That sounds reasonable. BD2412 T 16:04, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
The "hiving-off" has been done; my thanks to other editors who helped to polish up the new site. Arrivisto (talk) 09:59, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:29, 12 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Remove coverage of aircraft props?

[edit]

I'm thinking it might be a good idea to remove coverage of aircraft propellers here, and move any content to Propeller (aeronautics) that's not already covered there. I can at least get started on it, but I would like to get some feedback before making such a large change. Would this be a good idea? 206.204.236.108 (talk) 16:19, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Coverage of aircraft propellers is minor - it only addresses the history, and serves as a simple introduction to propellers in aircraft. This is appropriate.
The content of this small section should also be available on Propeller (aeronautics) but I’m not in favour of eliminating the section from this article. Dolphin (t) 07:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply