Talk:Propaganda techniques

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2014; 2016; 2017; 2021; 2023;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Propaganda techniques article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Marketing & Advertising High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Media Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup: Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV: Content (media and publishing)
Verify: Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other:
- Answer requests for comments

Politics High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology CL‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Military history. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

CL

This article has been rated as CL-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Lists High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Specific Techniques" section

Latest comment: 6 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Currently the "Specific Techniques" section is unfocused and disorganised. It reads like a glossary of buzzwords. There are multiple images, but it is unclear which techniques they correspond to. This section could be improved by grouping the techniques into categories, and by editing the image captions to make it clear which techniques they refer to. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 08:46, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

@MtPenguinMonster Sorry to disagree, but I don't personally think that the "Specific Techniques" section is disorganized, but I'm always here to negotiate and talk about the topic. 𝕷𝖆𝖛𝖆𝕾𝖆𝖑𝖙𝕬𝕺𝖅 - 𝖑 (talk) 18:09, 25 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

I have a higher quality image for the main image!

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The first picture @Barnacles14 talked about is a bad quality picture, so should we change it to this instead?

I think we should vote on it. If you want to vote, type YES or NO. CΛΛI (talk) 17:58, 25 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Propaganda techniques

"Specific Techniques" section

I have a higher quality image for the main image!

Archives (Index)
2014 2016 2017 2021 2023
This page is archived by ClueBot III.