Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a233b3d2da4e1ae0

Jump to content

Talk:Propadiene

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by BarrelProof in topic Requested move 25 June 2015

Requested move 25 June 2015

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Withdrawn by submitter per comment of 23:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC). The RM was submitted to correct an error that has already been corrected in a different way, and the submitter withdrew the suggestion. No support for the move had been expressed. —BarrelProof (talk) 13:30, 3 July 2015 (UTC)Reply



PropadieneProadifen – No evidence that "propadiene" is a synonym for "proadifen" --Relisted. Natg 19 (talk) 08:17, 3 July 2015 (UTC) 98.247.242.223 (talk) 23:06, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Upon further examination the text of the Proadifen article being here seems like a mistake that a simple reversion could have fixed. 98.247.242.223 (talk) 23:22, 25 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose this should not be a move request at all  Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.120.162.73 (talk) 22:02, 30 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose since the RM was submitted to correct an error that has already been corrected in a different way: The RM appears to be a reaction to this edit of 13:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC), which seems to have accidentally changed the article to be about a different topic. That has since been corrected, so the RM is moot. I suggest a speedy close, since the RM is just a reaction to a temporary error. —BarrelProof (talk) 13:25, 3 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.