Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.
// request.cf · coarse context
A page that knows where it met you.
Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
There seems to be a dedicated band of Tory-supporting blankers on Wikipedia. I'm used to it from pro-Israel people, but this is new to me. What is the problem with the material? I am happy to adjust the tone of it if needs be. ~ Iloveandrea (talk) 21:46, 5 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
You don't have to be a Tory supporter to spot bias when you see it. At present the article repeatedly takes opinions and treats them as facts. It ignores the government's POV on the matter and presents it in a purely negative light.
For example, fundamental to the series of edits that I reverted is the claim that Merlin was a "failure". We can't say that like that, because it's not a fact, but merely your own opinion - which would be disputed by the government, whose project it was. If it's relevant that some described Merlin as a failure, the article can discuss that, but it must then balance this with those that disagree. Kahastoktalk08:40, 6 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
