Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2333b7d4b93fad4

Jump to content

Talk:Project Habitance

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by PaladinOfDaedalus in topic Legality Section


Justifications for wikiproject assessment and importance

[edit]

Law enforcement

[edit]

Project Habitance is worthy being developed into a high class article. Subject is extremely notable, and has achieved international notability, and is notable within Europe, North America and South America.

Project Habitance is worthy of the importance level of High. It was an international operation which generated new case law in multiple countries, and utilized encryption breaking techniques for allegedly deanonymizing Tor users that were unprecedented at the time of the operation.

Feedback from New Page Review process

[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

SunDawn (contact) 09:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Legality Section

[edit]

The legality section is likely to become an amalgamation of different countries laws unless we clearly define what the section is for. It could be for the legality in the United Kingdom, or it could be written country specific but include the laws as it has been litigated for each of the countries that participated. Either can work, but it should be one or the other. This talk section should be used to work out examples and how to accomplish this goal. Will we include landmark high court cases, or all of the lower court arguments? Is it only quotes of scholars when quoted by the news or journals? etc. eximo (talk) 19:10, 15 March 2025 (UTC)Reply