Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21ef058fb92f41a

Jump to content

Talk:Project Gasbuggy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by 2600:1004:B10D:9D01:7DE8:C7C6:825F:5AEF in topic Second plaque?

Coordinate error

[edit]

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for

This location is reported as 36.677962, -107.207964 from this source: Center for Land Use Interpretation. http://clui.org/ludb/site-mapped/9/7329

The Google Map location does not look to be correct, as it's on a wooded ridge, away from any roads. The location indicated on the Center for Land Use Interpretation map appears to fit the description.

 Preceding unsigned comment added by TreeDoctor (talkcontribs)

I looked at the google map for that location, and if memory serves, it's vaguely familiar. That's probably it. Chubbles (talk) 00:41, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
 Done. The location marked on the CLUI page is confirmed by other online sources, so I've emended the coordinates accordingly. Deor (talk) 01:38, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Second plaque?

[edit]

The article states that there is a second plaque warning against potential exploitation of the site without permission of the Federal Government; however the picture of the plaque in the article contains exactly the information indicated in its second paragraph. This leads me to believe that either 1) the pictured plaque had subsequently been replaced by two later ones or 2) there is only the one plaque, containing the pertinent information in two separate paragraphs. The second explanation makes far more logical sense to me, but as I have never personally visited the site, I would love this to be documented rather than just unilaterally editing the article. 2600:1004:B10D:9D01:7DE8:C7C6:825F:5AEF (talk) 21:09, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply