Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22bcfde5e3bc235

Jump to content

Talk:Progressive Social Networks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Cwmhiraeth in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Created by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 02:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC).Reply

    General: Article is new enough and long enough

    Policy compliance:

    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: I'm a new reviewer, so would be grateful for a second opinion. —Granger (talk · contribs) 13:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

    Thanks. The Forbes source cited in that article says that she was "perceived to be among the most corrupt" and had been charged (though not convicted) with embezzlement. It seems obvious to me that Gordillo is corrupt, but I think we still need to cite it in the article per WP:BLP. —Granger (talk · contribs) 18:29, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
    @Mx. Granger: Done. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 00:41, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
    Thanks! I'm still not sure that source works for this claim, as (outside the headline) it just says that she's perceived to be corrupt, not that she actually is corrupt. But I'll leave that subtlety to others' judgement. Otherwise the article looks good. Granger (talk · contribs) 07:35, 18 February 2021 (UTC)Reply