Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a253dacb4cf0cc36

Jump to content

Talk:Professional boxing

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 26 days ago by Kaspar-trout in topic Maintenance templates

What the hell is with the scoring section?

[edit]

Its full of spelling errors and unless I'm mistaken, it's TOTALLY WRONG. There is no deduction for individual points per 2 punches. One boxer gets 10 and the one that didn't fight as well in a round gets 9, unless he was knocked down in which case he gets 8.

See this article, it should just be used verbatim, although it's probably copyrighted. http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mbox.html

I replaced the totally wrong parts of the scoring section. There are still some parts that could use better writing. Djcastel 15:56, 11 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Figure caption...

[edit]

...current Pound for Pound Boxer Román González is probably wrong. There is no such thing as a pound for pound boxer, I only heard of pound for pound rankings. Can an expert edit the caption, please? --Herbmuell (talk) 09:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Citations

[edit]

There are sections that list off dates and events with no attribution. Does anyone object to adding the insufficient citations template?

Also, might it be better as part of the boxing page instead of on its own? Ryanmsfinley (talk) 22:11, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:36, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

The Sweet Science

[edit]

The Sweet Science is another name for the sport of boxing not specifically professional boxing Unibond (talk) 22:58, 10 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: SSC199 TY2

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 November 2022 and 16 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mush3099 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Petersonr03 (talk) 18:07, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Page Image

[edit]

is it just me, or is the page image kinda terrible? I feel like the Marquess should be moved down to, say, the history section, and the page image be replaced by something more appropriate (in the style of the Amateur Boxing Page). Thoughts? Daniel P Botes (talk) 15:00, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Maintenance templates

[edit]

I have added inline citations to several previously unsourced parts of the article, including the lead, regulation/licensing, championship recognition, and rules/scoring sections. I also added non-U.S. regulatory examples, including the United Kingdom, Japan, the Philippines, and the European Boxing Union.

I think the inline-citations maintenance template may now be outdated, though the worldwide-view template may still need further work because the historical examples remain weighted toward the United States and the United Kingdom. Unless there are objections, I propose removing the inline-citations template while leaving the worldwide-view template in place for now (or not). The article needs work. Kaspar-trout (talk) 15:39, 7 July 2026 (UTC)Reply