Talk:Profanity
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Profanity article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
Social perception
[edit]“Profanity is often associated with lower class professions like soldiers and carters.”
- Not very important, but someone should provide a short explanation of class or a link to caste. It isn’t guaranteed that the person reading this understands what ‘lower class’ means. 2600:4040:54C7:3600:E1A7:FD10:B5F2:4C95 (talk) 22:15, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
edit request
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
As Adult language and other such redirect here, that could refer to sexual language, so please add a link in the hatnote to sexual content;
Please change :
{{redirect-several|dab=no|Abusive language (law)|Profane (religion)|Profanity (instant messaging client)|Strong Language (film){{!}}''Strong Language'' (film)|Curse (disambiguation)|Swear (disambiguation)}}
to
{{redirect-several|dab=no|Abusive language (law)|Profane (religion)|Profanity (instant messaging client)|Strong Language (film){{!}}''Strong Language'' (film)|Curse (disambiguation)|Swear (disambiguation)|sexual content}}
-- 65.93.183.249 (talk) 20:16, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Done meamemg (talk) 14:34, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 18 December 2025
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the "Anatomy and sexuality" section, a claim is made that "Danish uses testicles as a term of abuse with klotzaak." I don't have access to the Ljung paper, but I suspect that this is a double error on the part of either Ljung or whoever wrote this passage of the article. As far as I can tell, no such word exists in Danish; however, it is true that *klootzak* (not *klotzaak*) means "ballsack" and is a term of abuse in Dutch. Cstuartroe (talk) 22:44, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Please change
Danish uses testicles as a term of abuse with {{lang|da|klotzaak}}.
to
Dutch uses testicles as a term of abuse with {{lang|nl|klootzak}}.
The following citation may need replacement as well, if the error is present in the Ljung paper.
Done @Cstuartroe I checked the paper and it does indeed say Dutch. I made the edit on the page. InfernoHues (talk) 23:09, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
@InfernoHues You only partially addressed my request. The word is *klootzak*, not *klotzaak*.
- @Day Creature @Cstuartroe The source book lists the word as "klotzaak", which is why I kept it as is. I don't speak Dutch though, so I can't personally verify anything. InfernoHues (talk) 21:30, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Day Creature @InfernoHues Ok, well "klotzaak" is definitely an error. I'm not sure what the procedure is for providing sources, but do these suffice?
- https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/klootzak
- https://www.mijnwoordenboek.nl/vertaal/NL/EN/klootzak
- https://translate.google.com/?sl=en&tl=nl&text=What%20an%20asshole!&op=translate
- https://context.reverso.net/translation/dutch-english/klootzak Cstuartroe (talk) 04:45, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
- Looks good to me - marking the request as answered. Day Creature (talk) 05:43, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! Cstuartroe (talk) 20:48, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
- Looks good to me - marking the request as answered. Day Creature (talk) 05:43, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
"Unfounded profanity" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Unfounded profanity has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 30 § Unfounded profanity until a consensus is reached. Jruderman (talk) 02:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
"Abusive language" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Abusive language has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 25 § Abusive language until a consensus is reached. Dingolover6969 (talk) 10:31, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- B-Class sociology articles
- Mid-importance sociology articles
- B-Class Linguistics articles
- Mid-importance Linguistics articles
- WikiProject Linguistics articles