Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21bee224b69845c

Jump to content

Talk:Probability integral transform

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 13 years ago by 178.11.188.21 in topic any (??) given continuous distribution

Assumption?

[edit]

The intro paragraph says "provided that the assumption is true". What assumption? —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 13:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes, this page needs expansion, wit examples and illustrations.

In need of a re-write

[edit]

Very bad article in need of a re-write. The "Implementation" section is quite pathetic--if I didn't already know this stuff I'd be utterly lost. To propose merging with the Inverse Transform Sampling article would just make that article harder to understand. It would be better to completely delete this and keep the Inverse Transform Sampling article than merge the two. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.97.32.36 (talk) 16:48, 17 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

I have removed the merge template as the topics are entirely different. Moving the applications up should have made this clear. Melcombe (talk) 20:52, 17 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

any (??) given continuous distribution

[edit]

"the probability integral transform or transformation relates to the result that data values that are modelled as being random variables from any given continuous distribution can be converted to random variables having a uniform distribution." I suppose that is not correct generally, but only for one dimensional continuous distributions. What do you think? 178.11.188.21 (talk) 16:55, 31 January 2013 (UTC)Reply