Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21ef5a90a9421ca

Jump to content

Talk:Probability distribution fitting

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Pia novice in topic More specific information required

This article is written like notes to a lecture

[edit]

This article is written like notes to a lecture, not like an encyclopedia entry (which it should be). 2A05:1D43:563:0:7D64:2B27:D821:5706 (talk) 16:06, 11 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

More specific information required

[edit]

This page is too unspecific, for example: "By ranking the goodness of fit of various distributions one can get an impression of which distribution is acceptable and which is not." This is probably obvious to most readers. What is not obvious is how the goodness of fit can be assessed, because the methods are quite different to common methods for assessing least-squares or model performance. Methods should be listed for assessing the goodness of distribution fits, for example the Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test. Parts of the article also appear like an advertisement for the programme cumFreq, for example, the figure showing the ranking of the goodness of fit conveys little information on how the goodness of fit is actually assessed, and only demonstrates the programme.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Pia novice (talkcontribs) 12:48, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply