Talk:Priority encoder
Add topicLatest comment: 5 years ago by 76.24.228.221
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
i think that this is wrong: Priority encoders can be easily connected in arrays to make larger encoders, such as one 16-to-4 encoder made from six 4-to-2 priority encoders - four 4-to-2 encoders having the signal source connected to their inputs, and the two remaining encoders take the output of the first four as input. - you don't get a priority encoder this way. 84.109.13.150 (talk) 18:55, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
it is the best encoder for some simple uses — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.186.176.53 (talk) 10:18, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
The recursive construction still has height log n, not log(n/k). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.24.228.221 (talk) 19:30, 25 March 2021 (UTC)