Talk:Prince Romerson/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 07:15, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Will review. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 07:15, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

General

• Refer to him consistently as either "Prince Romerson" or "Romerson" once you have introduced him.

• Done.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 16:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

• What exactly is Prince Romerson best known for? What is special about him?

• Difficult to answer since everyone has their own definition of special. He was a soldier who fought in the Civil War. His military service in the Navy, Army and the Buffalo Soldiers and the renewed interests among Hawaiian researchers currently about these type of figures.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 16:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Lead

• The lead should be a least a good para long for an article of this length, touching all the main points of the article

• Shorten slightly, but I am hoping to get this to A-List and FAC status later on and just waiting to expand it a bit more and those type of article require broader opening introductions.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 16:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Life

• ...included in lists of Filipino American Civil War combatants There are 4 refs at the end of this. I think three would have done.

• Done.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 16:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Legacy

• However, in recent years It should be clearer what time you are referring to exactly

• This is hard to specify since the sources don't indicate a time period and guessing one require me to synthesize the sources. Also there is a clear idea what time it is referring to by the 2010 date in the same paragraph. --KAVEBEAR (talk) 16:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

@KAVEBEAR: Please respond. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 05:15, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

@Sainsf: Let me know what else. Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 16:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the changes. I am happy to promote this. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 17:32, 26 June 2016 (UTC)