Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24156a5d9664652

Jump to content

Talk:Prime power

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 years ago by D.Lazard in topic Definition

[Untitled]

[edit]

I would like to find a Prime number >10 power 15, could some one help me out. Thanks

230,402,457 − 1, see Mersenne prime for known large primes. Charles Matthews 19:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

prime powers in arithmetic sequences

[edit]

Are there results on generalizations to Dirichlet's theorem on infinitely many primes in arithmetic sequences? Like, if (a,b)=1, might there be infinitely many squares of primes in the set {a + nb}?Rich 17:26, 19 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Definition

[edit]

@JayBeeEll: Hi, I changed the definition because in a true definition subject and object should be in its correct position. In

In mathematics, a prime power is a positive integer power of a single prime number.

The subject is "power", but it is not correct, subject should be a prime number, I persist that this definition is more illustrative:

In mathematics, a prime power is a prime number to the power of a positive integer.

Additionally, the word "single" in the first definition is redundant, we have "prime number" and "composite number", here "single" is redundant. Hooman Mallahzadeh (talk) 17:09, 17 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

While I agree that the sentence is, at present, somewhat awkward, your revised version is much more awkward. The theory you put forward here (ignoring the misuse of the word "subject") is definitely wrong: the word "power" can refer both to the exponent and to the result of exponentiation ("8 is a power of 2" is idiomatic mathematical English, at least where I'm from) so a prime power is a power, but a prime power is most certainly not a prime number. If I get some time (& remember) I will think about how else that sentence could be made clearer. --JBL (talk) 22:07, 18 December 2021 (UTC)|Reply
I agree with JBL. Moreover your formulation would make incorrect sentences such as "8 and 9 are prime powers", which are not only correct, but also commonly used in mathematics (see the second paragraph of Finite field for an example in Wikipedia). D.Lazard (talk) 09:23, 19 December 2021 (UTC)Reply