Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a228c74efd37a8fe

Jump to content

Talk:Prime end

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 years ago by 2600:1700:E1C0:F340:51D8:9622:7136:B603 in topic Unfortunately, the "formal definition" is not a formal definition

Unfortunately, the "formal definition" is not a formal definition

[edit]

The so-called "formal definition" of prime ends — the only definition in this article — is as follows:

"The set of prime ends of the domain B is the set of equivalence classes of chains of arcs converging to a point on the boundary of B.

"In this way, a point in the boundary may correspond to many points in the prime ends of B, and conversely, many points in the boundary may correspond to a point in the prime ends of B."

This meantions "equivalence classes of chains of arcs".

Unfortunately neither the concept of "chains of arcs", nor the "equivalence classes" referred to here, is explained at all.

Can someone who both understands the concept and who understands how to explain things please fix this?2600:1700:E1C0:F340:51D8:9622:7136:B603 (talk) 04:05, 24 November 2017 (UTC)Reply