Talk:Prime Inc.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by HurricaneZeta (talk) 22:31, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that American trucking company Prime Inc. sued Amazon over its use of the Amazon Prime logo?

• Source:

• • ALT1: ... that the United States Supreme Court issued a decision against trucking company Prime Inc. in New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira? Source:
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Easy Delivery Co.

Moved to mainspace by Zeibgeist (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 6 past nominations.

Zeibgeist (talk) 00:18, 2 December 2025 (UTC).

• @Zeibgeist: I will close this in 24 hours if I don't see a QPQ.--Launchballer 14:12, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

  @Launchballer: QPQ now completed. Zeibgeist (talk) 02:11, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

• This looks like a top-notch article. However, if I'm not mistaken, this is technically not new enough, as it was nominated about seven days, 16 hours after the article's creation. @Launchballer: Is this correct? Happy to re-review if not. JTtheOG (talk) 03:39, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

  I think I just created the nomination in time? I moved the article to mainspace at 07:36 on 25 November and created the nomination at 00:18 on 2 December. That's a few hours to spare until a full seven days had elapsed, unless I'm misunderstanding the guidelines. Zeibgeist (talk) 03:54, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

  Right. Sorry about that. I was looking at the time of the draft's creation! Reviewing shortly. JTtheOG (talk) 04:21, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

• Article was moved from draftspace within seven days of nomination. The article is long enough, the sourcing is good, and there are no identifiable copyvio issues. QPQ was recently done. The primary hook fact checks out and is in the article, as well as being sufficiently interesting. Nice work; this looks good to go! JTtheOG (talk) 00:26, 4 December 2025 (UTC)