Talk:Primavera (software)
Add topic | XER (file format) was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 29 September 2017 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Notability
[edit]P3 software is extensively used in the construction industry. I'm hoping that you will allow me to expand on this page with other interested parties. Cheers.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Wd57 (talk • contribs) 21:25, 17 September 2007
- I can attest to Wd57's claim that this software is notable. I know that "google hits" are a bad metic, but just to slow down the editors who might be quick to slam down an AFD, 47 books on the subject at Amazon.com, and 700+ jobs for people with the ability to use this software, 22 for the US Federal Gov't alone. I'm not an expert on the subject. I just have friends that work in the construction project planning industry, so I don't know if I'll be able to provide articles on the subject; but they are out there. —A 09:23, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- I can attest it is used extensively (I used it at a previous job). We need to get the secondary sources in. Spryde 15:08, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
The Lemma "Primavera P3
[edit]This article should be moved to "Primavera P6", because this is the latest version of the Primavera Project Planner. But what shall be done, if the next version is released (P7 or something like that)? Perhaps it is a good idea to choose quite a different lemma, "Primavera Project Management" or... --Jntheis (talk) 22:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Suggest move to Primavera Project Planner, with redirects from Primavera P3 and P6 etc....--Kelapstick (talk) 13:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, sounds to me like the best solution --Mathusael (talk) 13:13, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
External Links
[edit]The InSynchro external link seems to be nothing more than an advertisement for their consulting services in very limited markets. There's no additional info on Primavera. The only link/content on the page is a sales contact. I suggest this link be removed, but not sure what the policies are? Nikola Novak (talk) 14:29, 14 June 2012 (UTC)