Talk:PrimaLoft
Add topicLatest comment: 8 years ago by Grozo in topic CLO Values
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Alternative to?
[edit]It's not likely, despite the quoted source, that the Army was looking, in the 1980s, for an alternative to feathers, but rather to other synthetic fibers, which somehow were not adequate. Would be much more interesting to say why the artificial fibers were inadequate.24.6.66.149 (talk) 12:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
"similar dry performance"
[edit]The numbers I know are only half(!) as good as good down.--Scanmap (talk) 17:54, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
CLO Values
[edit]Need a chart with the CLO values of various types of PrimaLoft (Gold, Silver, etc). Grozo (talk) 17:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- C-Class Brands articles
- Unknown-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles