Talk:Practice Statement
Add topicLatest comment: 1 year ago by Bearian in topic Do you agree with Lord Gardiner's practice statement 1966?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Practice Statement article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Do you agree with Lord Gardiner's practice statement 1966?
[edit]Do you agree with Lord Gardiner's Practice Statement of 1966?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.93.33.10 (talk) 13:32, 6 November 2004 (UTC)
yes i do agree but i think it should have been available to court of appeal instead of them having to rely heavily on the young criteria— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.22.78.35 (talk) 00:16, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
if the court of appeal was able to use the pratice statment as well as the house of lords, fair enough law reform would take place a lot quicker, but the united kindgon would have no last resort court to make an overall decision, and the hierarchy of the courts would be in disarray. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.161.178 (talk) 18:33, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- "This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Practice Statement article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject." Bearian (talk) 23:03, 24 May 2025 (UTC)