Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2246cf9aaf14a3e

Jump to content

Talk:Potter Building

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Yoninah
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:03, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Potter Building
Potter Building
  • ... that the Potter Building (pictured) was built with the most up-to-date fireproofing available because its predecessor burned down? Source: New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission; Dolkart, Andrew S.; Postal, Matthew A. (2009). Postal, Matthew A. (ed.). Guide to New York City Landmarks (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. p. 27.
    • ALT1:... that the Potter Building (pictured) replaced a structure that "made itself notorious the country over for burning up in the shortest time on record"? Source: NYCL p. 3
    • ALT2:... that during the construction of the Potter Building (pictured), the developer burned down two structures? Source: The New Potter Building

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 17:41, 25 March 2020 (UTC).Reply

    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
    QPQ: Done.

    Overall: Looks good to me. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 19:43, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

    • Hi, I came by to promote ALT2, which is super hooky, but upon reading the article I realize it is more of an April Fools hook. Do you want to nominate it for then, or would you like to tweak it so it is more in style with our everyday hooks? Yoninah (talk) 19:53, 26 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
    • Yoninah, thanks for the query. I don't think ALT2 is quite hooky enough as an April Fool's hook (which wasn't my intention at all). How about this?