Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21e06fad89bf41a

Jump to content

Talk:Potluck

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Ponyo in topic Legal Consequences?

Nash's Pot-lucke

[edit]

Where does it say that pot-lucke means "food provided for an unexpected or uninvited guest, the luck of the pot"? There is one reference but it's not there. LucasW (talk) 21:19, 15 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

@LucasW Agreed. He uses it in the context of wine, as he does in his play "Summer's Last Will and Testament". He doesn't use it in the context of food in either source. Instead it seems to mean the last bit of wine left in a vessel. 174.197.133.149 (talk) 04:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Bring a plate\" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Bring a plate\ has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 30 § Bring a plate\ until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:22, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

[edit]

The legal consequences section of this article has nothing to do with potluck dinners. Is it AI garbage? Dog-519 (talk) 11:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Someone removed it, describing it as "vandalism". Yes, it should have been removed without a clearer explanation as to how it pertains to an actual potluck, but there's no reason to consider it vandalism. As a courtesy I notified the editor who added the content. Sundayclose (talk) 18:29, 19 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
It's very hoax adjacent, with this this article about a humourous Tik Tok account being presented as historical fact.-- Ponyobons mots 21:25, 19 September 2025 (UTC)Reply