Talk:Potez 630

This article received the WikiWings award for February 2005 --Rlandmann 13:34, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)

article structure

I think this article should be split in three parts:

1) Potez 630 (also covering 631 and other fighter projects) 2) Potez 633 (and other bomber projects) 3) Potez 63.11 (also covering 637 and other recon variants).

These three categories have almost entirely different operational careers, and were never mixed within units, so it's rather natural. Objections?

PpPachy 22:01, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

I'd keep a common design/development section but the three variants could be discussed separately in Operational History. - Emt147 ^Burninate! 23:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

How about entirely different articles? The common development section could be covered in the 630/631 article. PpPachy 13:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

IMHO different articles are good idea. Piotr Mikołajski 16:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

I've dropped this article down one level for lack of inline citations.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:45, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Surviving aircraft

Are there any surviving examples of this aircraft? PrussianOwl (talk) 07:18, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

No, but there is a replica 63-11 being built (perhaps finished by now), in the US based at least partially on original blueprints. - NiD.29 (talk) 22:03, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Hm, I'd like to see this project be added to the article, as a replica Potez 63.11 seems notable enough. ScribeYearling (talk) 06:11, 11 November 2024 (UTC)