Talk:Potassium

"Koal" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Koal has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 30 § Koal until a consensus is reached. cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 19:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

europe-nutrition

this section has the words "need need". 195.250.166.188 (talk) 09:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Good catch, fixed now. ^Complex/_Rational 14:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Wikipedia's W.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:08, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Article review

It has been a while since this article was reviewed, so I took a look and noticed lots of uncited statements, including entire paragraphs (espcially in the "dietary" section). Should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 03:23, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

Potassium

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Issues appear to have been resolved. Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:44, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Uncited statements, including entire paragraphs (especially in the "North American" subsection of the "Dietary" section). Z1720 (talk) 03:24, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

The North American section is in fact fully-cited, but someone had split it into tiny paragraphs without repeating the citations. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:02, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• @Chiswick Chap: I have added citation needed tags to the article to highlight other places that need them. Z1720 (talk) 22:15, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

  Let's hope there are still some chemists around to fix them. Chiswick Chap (talk) 02:26, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

@Z1720 Editors @Smokefoot, @Reconrabbit and I have worked over the article since your post. All of the citation-needed tags you added are fixed along with other improvements. Johnjbarton (talk) 03:35, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

• @Johnjbarton: I have added some additional citation needed templates. The "Supplementation" section needs to be formatted more effectively, with paragraphs being merged together. Z1720 (talk) 03:45, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

  @Z1720 Yes, supplementation was mess. Please review my changes. Johnjbarton (talk) 18:29, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

• @Johnjbarton: I added a couple of cn tags to review. Z1720 (talk) 14:34, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

  Hello, has there been any progress on this? Keres🌕Luna ^edits! 20:15, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

• Keep, I think? While not perfect, it seems like everything is cited. Unless someone states that there is a major aspect missing, I think this can keep its status. Z1720 (talk) 21:28, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.