Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2293e1378ef1709

Jump to content

Talk:Postpartum bleeding

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 July 2019 and 23 August 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alexuang, Dannymrowr, Brendado425, Mparagas18. Peer reviewers: Pkhouder, Kmhudson22.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Guideline

[edit]

The ISTH Scientific Standardisation Commmittee (SSC) has issued a guideline on the management of coagulopathy in PPH. doi:10.1111/jth.13174 JFW | T@lk 11:32, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Foundations 2 2019, Group 3b goals

[edit]

Expand on signs and symptoms of bleeding to cover more serious signs and symptoms, including circulatory shock and potential encephalopathy. --Dannymrowr (talk) 20:27, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Foundations II Group 3A Peer Review

[edit]

Part 1

1.Do the group’s edits substantially improve the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review “guiding framework”? The group's edit provided information that allowed the readers what to look out for (signs and symptoms) when dealing with postpartum bleeding Kylett1 (talk) 16:45, 6 August 2019 (UTC) Yes, the group’s edits have substantially improved the article. The addition of postpartum hemorrhage in signs and symptoms, as well as expanding on general signs and symptoms have improved the article content.Pkhouder (talk) 04:58, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

yes the groups edits have improved the article, they have expanded the knowledge on the sign and symptoms. Kmhudson22 (talk) 16:39, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

2. Has the group achieved its overall goals for improvement? Yes, the group has achieved its overall goal for improvement, specifically expanding on shock, one of the possible sign due to severe bleeding Kylett1 (talk) 16:45, 6 August 2019 (UTC) Yes, the group has achieved their proposed goals for improvement by expanding on signs and symptoms.Pkhouder (talk) 04:58, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

yes the group has met the goals they set out to achieve for improvement. Kmhudson22 (talk) 16:39, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Part 2:

A. yes the edits do reflect a neutral point of view Kmhudson22 (talk) 16:39, 6 August 2019 (UTC) B. yes Kylett1 (talk) 16:45, 6 August 2019 (UTC) C. yesReply